Commissioning Case Study
Getting energy efficiency approval
through retro-commissioning.
through retro-commissioning.
Because of higher energy costs, the Atlanta FDA facility was selected for an energy conservation project thatincluded retrocommissioning as part of the scope in 2008. The purpose of the retro-commissioning was to identifyand implement low- and no-cost energy savings opportunities. The retrocommissioning was part of anoverall energy conservation project with Georgia Powerthat implemented other capital improvements to the facility. Those improvements included replacing old boilers and pumps, lighting upgrades and installing lowflow plumbing fixtures. Sustainable Engineering Solutions was selected to perform the retrocommissioning. Partial funding of the project was provided through Georgia Power under their energy conservation programs.
Sustainable Engineering Solutions completed the retro-commissioning in April of 2009. The scope of the retro-commissioning focused on energy savings measures related to the HVAC system and controls. The facility has undergone two additions since originally constructed in 1959 and is actually three distinct buildings with separate heating and cooling plants for each building. As a large building with a high density of laboratories that operate 24 hours per day and interspersed office and administrativeareas, it is easy to understand how beneficialretrocommissioning could be to a facility such as this. This building was not owned by the FDA but rather leased and therefore some of the items identified were not readily implemented under this project. Those items were brought to the attention of the landlord with the associated energy and cost savings opportunities they represent subsequent to the project.An emphasis on optimizing the various control strategies, where practicable, to improve the energy efficiency of the controls systems was a priority throughout the process. Optimization strategies included equipment staging routines, control sensor calibration or replacement, supply air temperature reset, chilled water and hot water supply temperature reset, duct static pressure reset, and night setback and setup routines.
“With the national awareness of energy conservation driving efforts to make efficient building performance part of standard practice, the need for specialists with experience in evaluating energy consumption, performing energy audits and coordinating utility company incentives will continue to grow.”
Ernest Lawas, PE, CCP, LEED AP, CEM
Sustainable Engineering Solutions, LLC
Quick Facts
Building Name:
Atlanta FDA Facility
Location:
Atlanta, GA
Project:
Retro-commissioning
Commissioning Scope:
Energy savings measures
related to the HVAC
systems and controls
Building Size:
162,000 ft2
Total Commissioning Cost:
$44,000
Commissioning Cost/ft2:
$0.27
Annual Energy Savings:
$24,000 per year
*Does not include implementation costs
Additional Measures
Heating hot water strategies not
utilized in facilityOutside air temperature enable
setpoint for cooling plant raised from
42°F to 53°F.Occupancy schedules implemented
on multiple air handling systems that
were operating 24/7.Replacement of failed temperature
sensors causing mechanical cooling
systems to operate when not
required.Raising air handling unit discharge air
temperature setpoints to appropriate
values (from 46°F to 55°F).Calibration of chilled water
differential pressure sensors to
correct secondary pumps from
over‐pumping the system.
Adjustment of boiler staging to
optimize firing sequence.
Replacement of failed duct static
pressure sensor for variable air
volume (VAV) air handlers.
Adjustment of chiller staging to
optimize mechanical cooling
sequence and disable lag chillers
when not required.